9‑Seat Investigative Interview Panel
Templates
Templates
1) What are we investigating or deciding? (1–5 sentences)
2) What does success look like? (bullets)
3) Constraints (time, budget, region, tools, format):
4) What you already believe is true (claims) (bullets):
5) Evidence you already have (links/text/data):
6) What you suspect might be false/risky/biased:
7) Non-goals / boundaries:
8) Deadline (if any):
9) Preferred tone + confrontation limit:
Assumption | K/I/S | Impact | How to test | Owner seat
Claim | Best evidence | Current evidence | Gaps | Tier | Owner
Item A vs Item B | Source | Why it conflicts | What resolves it | Owner
Option | Pros | Cons | Risks | Mitigations | Evidence needed | Fit to success criteria
Minority Report — Seat [#]
- Disputed point:
- Their claim:
- Why:
- What evidence would change their mind:
- Risk if majority proceeds: